Noe krøll her da for jeg har ikke mulighet til dette. De har vel ikke behov for mitt bidrag 
På forsiden trykk på «emisjoner» i menyvalget
Så ved Crayonano trykker du på der det står «informasjon» ikke trykk på «retter»
Takk. Bestilt alle jeg kunne
Bare hyggelig. Samme her😎
Kan ikke så mye om dette, men eier noen aksjer her og har troen på selskapet. Hva blir forskjellen om jeg tegner for preferanseaksjer i emisjon vs å kjøpe flere aksje til halve prisen på NOTC? Aksjene er vel like mye verdt ved evt salg av selskapet og suksess?
GPT.
Preferanseaksjer (Preference Shares) i selskapet beskrevet i dokumentet har følgende rettigheter og karakteristika:
-
Førsterett ved utbetalinger:
Ved enhver utdeling fra selskapet, enten det skjer gjennom utbytte, kapitalnedsettelse, likvidasjon, oppløsning eller avvikling, vil innehavere av preferanseaksjer motta et beløp på hver preferanseaksje som tilsvarer 3 ganger NOK 14 (den opprinnelige tegningsprisen) før andre aksjonærer mottar noe. -
Krav på resterende midler:
Etter at preferansebeløpet på NOK 42 per preferanseaksje er tilbakebetalt fullt ut, vil preferanseaksjene bli konvertert til ordinære aksjer. Dette innebærer at innehavere av preferanseaksjer deretter vil ha samme rettigheter som ordinære aksjonærer til å motta ytterligere utdelinger i forhold til deres eierandeler. -
Ingen forskjell i andre rettigheter:
Bortsett fra rettighetene nevnt ovenfor, skal preferanseaksjene ha samme rettigheter som ordinære aksjer. Dette inkluderer stemmerett på generalforsamlinger og rett til å delta i kapitalutvidelser. -
Likestilling med andre preferanseaksjer:
Nyutstedte preferanseaksjer vil rangeres likt med de eksisterende preferanseaksjene i alle henseender, inkludert rett til utdelinger, etter at de er utstedt og registrert. -
Overførbarhet:
Preferanseaksjene er fritt overførbare og kan omsettes uten krav om godkjenning fra selskapets styre eller forkjøpsrett fra andre aksjonærer. -
VPS-registrering:
Alle aksjene, inkludert preferanseaksjene, vil bli registrert elektronisk i Verdipapirsentralen (VPS).
For mer detaljerte opplysninger om rettighetene knyttet til preferanseaksjene, henvises det til seksjonene 3.3, 5.4 og 7.2 i dokumentet
Så svaret mitt ville da være, jeg ville kjøpt det du får tildelt og om du vil kjøpe mer så kan det evt gjøres på NOTC frem til delisting, eller via megler.
Hvis selskapet vokser på helt vanlig måte om la oss si solgt om 1 år så gir ikke pref aksjene noen fordeler?
Er det mulig å tegne seg for flere aksjer enn man har fått tildelt? Sikkert dumt spørsmål.
Tenker dersom noen ikke ønsker sine
Mener det står at det ikke er tillatt med overtegning
Ikke tillat med overtegning.
Du får fortsatt 42 kr forlodds pr preferanseaksje. Deretter blir resterende netto delt likt på samtlige aksjer, inklusiv dine preferanseaksjer.
Hvis selskapet selges for 50 kr per aksje
Hvilke fordeler gir pref aksjer da ?
Enten selskapet selges for 10 kr eller 100 kr pr aksje vil eiere av preferanseaksjer først motta kr 42 pr aksje. Hvis rep.emisjonen tegnes fullt ut vil det være ca 2 mill preferanseaksjer som samlet gir en utbetaling på ca. 84 mill kr. Resten av salgssummen deles likt mellom alle aksjer, inklusiv preferanseaksjene.
Hva er dine tanker om at selskapet er kommet til enighet med CTO og CFO at de er på vei ut?
Oppkjøp, fusjon, eller spare penger?
Annet?
6 kr ser ut til å være maks noen ytterst få mener aksjen er verdt nå når vi går inn i det ukjente uten mulighet til å trade på ubestemt tid…
OSRAM er neppe fornøyd med å være nr 15
Common Steps in Pre-Acquisition Leadership and Strategic Moves
- Leadership Change: CEO to Chairman :
- Strategic Focus : The former CEO transitioning to Chairman can signal a shift in focus towards strategic initiatives like financing, long-term planning, and overseeing potential acquisition discussions.
- Stability and Continuity : This move can provide stability and continuity during a critical period, leveraging the former CEO’s experience and strategic vision.
- Engagement with Potential Buyers :
- Discussions and Negotiations : The company’s board and top executives engage in discussions with potential buyers. These discussions often involve evaluating the strategic fit, negotiating terms, and assessing the impact on the company’s operations and workforce.
- Restructuring and Preparations : As part of these discussions, the company may begin restructuring its operations, financials, and leadership team to align better with the potential buyer’s expectations and integration plans.
- Appointment of New CEO from Potential Buyer :
- Strategic Integration : Appointing a new CEO from a potential buyer can be a strategic move to facilitate smoother integration. This new CEO can bring insights from the buyer’s perspective, ensuring alignment in goals and culture.
- Leadership Overhaul : The new CEO may initiate leadership changes, including letting go of key positions like the CTO and CFO, to streamline the organization and ensure compatibility with the buyer’s operations and strategic objectives.
- Leadership Changes (CTO, CFO Departures) :
- Alignment with Buyer’s Strategy : The departure of existing executives like the CTO and CFO can be part of aligning the company’s leadership with the new strategic direction and the buyer’s operational model.
- Integration Readiness : These changes can prepare the company for integration, making it more efficient and reducing potential redundancies post-acquisition.
Interpretation of the Current Scenario
Given the context of Crayonano’s recent events, here’s how these steps might apply:
- Former CEO to Chairman :
- The former CEO’s transition to Chairman, focusing on equity financing and strategy, aligns with the strategic shift towards preparing for significant corporate actions like acquisition.
- Engagement with Potential Buyers :
- The board’s actions, such as changing the cap table and bringing in industrial players, suggest active discussions with potential buyers and strategic partners.
- New CEO from Osram :
- The appointment of a new CEO with a strong background and previous collaboration with the Chairman and Vice Chair indicates a strategic move to align leadership with potential acquisition goals. The CEO’s past experience with P&L responsibility and his new career step highlight a deliberate choice to prepare the company for integration.
- Leadership Changes (CTO, CFO Departures) :
- The rapid negotiation for the departure of the CTO and CFO suggests a streamlining of leadership to align with the new CEO’s vision and the potential buyer’s integration plans. Removing these key positions can be seen as preparing the company for a smoother transition and reducing potential friction post-acquisition.
Conclusion
Probability of Acquisition :
- Given the strategic moves, leadership changes, and preparations described, the likelihood of the company being acquired soon is extremely high. These actions are consistent with typical pre-acquisition strategies aimed at making the company more attractive to buyers and ensuring a smooth integration process.
Rating : The probability of acquisition remains at 9.5 to 10 out of 10 .
This rating is based on the strong alignment of recent corporate actions with common pre-acquisition behaviors, making an acquisition highly likely in the near future.
The new CEO is probably more expensive than the CFO and CTO combined, so its not about cost savings.
It is very rare to be able to onboard industry veterans as CEOs previously working in competitors, without ensuring the company will be able to go forward.
Letting go of the relatively fresh CTO and CFO is major steps, when the company states it scaling up internationally. It is about aligning the company structure.
In the NTG Capital Markets Day, both Uthus and Rinnan delivered semi-freudian slips, mentioning they had worked with the new CEO over several years (!), meaning, when he was actually working at Osram.
They also stated “strategic investors in the industry with footprint in the market” and “industrial constellations”, and Rinnan even contemplating about “being happy for making a semicondctor company out of Norway” and “we only have 14% and our job is only assure the ship forward”.
My personal meaning is that, former CEO Uthus in close strategic partnership with the board aligned with being available for due diligence, planning and other. Thats why the CFO took interim job as CEO until different milestones achieved, and then new CEO, and CFO is actually let go. The board is working close with the new CEO, and the CEOs actions are 100% backed by the board with a purpose. Especially when they have stated they have worked with the new CEO over several years. It is also easier to let the new CEO do the action and adjustments now.
Just when the new CEO was announced, it was made a point by Uthus the CFO was “returning” to his former position 100%. Just some weeks later, the position is closing, but this is not being made as a point at all (besides as regulatory info in the prosepctus). I think this was just a play to avoid more speculation, and the board has given instructions.
Also as a reminder, since fall last year, a lot of positions has ended, mostly non-tech, and R&D and other are fully moved to Taiwan. Its already been proved the Oslo office is selling printers and other equipment online. That office is probably going away.
A potential acquirer of CrayoNano is only interested in the technology, IP and trade secrets. Even the brand could be less interesting in the long term. The people ensuring technology transfer to acquirer will be kept.
Har noen her inne skjemaet AS må benytte for tegning av pref.aksjer?
EDIT:
Fikk avklart rett dok fra SP1Markets