Jeg kan vÊre pÄ ville veier, men greit om de kan svare.
Gentlemen,
I am bewildered.
It would be good if you could explain a few matters at hand following your latest press release:
-
When did Atlas cure the violation of clause 5.2b in the âInvestment and Subscription Agreementâ (ISA) which seems to have occured on May 30th ?
-
How many shares did they need to purchase to cure the violation ?
-
How can they be entitled to convert a new bond at a price of NOK 0,4952 when said price obviously is a direct result of the violation ?
I may be wrong, but something doesnât quite add up by comparing the number of shares Atlas should have purchased, and the closing balance of shares listed at the Citi/Atlas account from May 30th and onwards. To me it seems like they still need to purchase somewhere between 800K and 2000K shares to cure the violation. The broad range of shares I am referring to is to cover for the most likely interpretations of the term âtrading weekâ which unfortunately has no clear definition in the ISA, and whether the actual number of shares sold by Atlas (the violation) should be taken into account when calculating the number of shares they need to purchase to cure the violation.
It almost seems like we need an independent umpire to make sure that both you and Atlas are honoring the conditions which are presented in the ISA, which by recent experiences appears to be incomplete the way it has been disclosed to the public