Diskusjon Triggere Porteføljer Aksjonærlister

CrayoNano AS

Elektronikk
#2998

Jeg føler kanskje det er på sin plass å minne om at EIC gikk inn etter en tung konkurranse der over 4200 selskap konkurrerte om EICs gunst (og penger).

Chosen among 4,200 companies
The EIC Accelerator is designed for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMES)
with radically new ideas underpinned by a business plan for rolling out marketable
innovation solutions and with ambitions to scale up. Selected companies receive
funding and they get extra acceleration services to connect with investors, corporates
and likeminded entrepreneurs.
CrayoNano was selected FROM 4,200 companies.
CrayoNano’s winning proposal is titled “The first nanowire-on-graphene UVC LED
technology able to give the efficiency, lifetime, and cost needed for mass deployment
disinfection.” The project presented to EIC Accelerator represents the core of the
CrayoNano technology. Through this grant the company will get access to a wide
network that will enhance the commercialization and benchmarking of this
groundbreaking technology.
The company´s product portfolio is designed using breakthrough nanotechnology
enabling a new UVC LED chip to the market – solving the fundamental material
problems in current UVC LED chips.

EIC leker ikke butikk, og filtreringen er bunnsolid. Det er hovedgrunnen til at jeg lar aksjene støve ned i påvente av nyheter etter een tids seiling i tåke :slight_smile:

2 Likes
#2999

Lurer på om de slettet siste post på LinkedIn, de lå et spørsmål der. Men ser det ikke.

Ang EIC - selv om de ikke leker butikk så tar de nå feil på noen. Men håper de har satset på rett hest.

#3000

Godt mulig at hesten har røket gaffelbåndet ja🙂

#3001

Here is the new company of 3 former CrayoNano employees and information about their offering:

https://www.nybpartner.no

#3002

Ja, nå nærmer aksjen seg prising lik den vi ser på tech startups :slight_smile: 296 MNOK, and falling.

Hva er ATL på CNANO, noen som har tallene?

#3003

Jeg tror vi er ved ATL nå. Kr 7 er det jeg finner som ATL, som var for noen måneder siden.

#3004

Hvordan er det med opsjoner, aksjer osv
Rinnan, Jo Uthus osv må også ha aksjekursen masse opp herfra for å komme ut av eventyret med gevinst ?

#3005

Adressen til selskapet ser ut til å være på en privatadresse, mens alle bilder på hjemmesiden tror jeg er fra labben til Crayonano

#3007

Nok en intetsigende melding…

Klikker du på produktet eller linken så havner du på “kontakt oss”…

#3008

Tror det er meningen at du skal havne på kontakt skjema, men de kunne sagt - trykk her for å komme i kontakt med oss.

Uansett så er det vel en ny melding uten noe nytt, men det er mange som sender ut samme info flere ganger for å bygge “awareness” :slight_smile:

Nå har de 2155 følgere på Linkedin, se ut som det kommer inn et par nye hele tiden, men har ikke notert meg oppgangen…

#3009

Tolker det dit hen at alt handler om 2 gen nå. Ingen samarbeidsavtaler meldes lengre på eksisterende teknologi. Virker som de innser at det ikke er noe poeng i å inngå samarbeid på noe annet enn nanowires produktet som forhåpentligvis kommer snart. Hvordan skal man ellers lese situasjonen? Det kan umulig være helt tilfeldig at nyhetsflow har stoppet helt opp.

1 Like
#3010

It seems CrayoNano is changing and consolidating the communication channels, building a valuable subscription list for the newsletter being the core forward, hence be able to push the news instead of followers looking up the news. They are possibly migrating away from NOTC and website published news as communications channel.

Also most probably gathering up all news for the newsletters (and Q-updates) in order for the publishing to to be of actual news and not summaries of old news.

On a side note: Companies will use PR/media when “hyping” and designing a narrative (because of an undisclosed mission). However, with time and successful traction and milestones achievement, the PR/media will shift or pause, and that is a sign of maturation. You do not need to hype anymore.

With regard to the published signed commercial contracts, this also had a purpose, but if the pipelines is over 100+ current design-ins with customers, this communications strategy may also shift because commercial milestone achievements. Publishing any kind of contracts may also been looked upon as desperate in communication strategy. Also remember that customers actually needs to approve being mentioned in sign contracts, in addition disclosing all kinds of contracts may disclose the companies areas of traction and could be considered trade secrets.

Agree, its obviously not random that the last published message on the webpage was the minutes from the extra general assembly.

2 Likes
#3011

7 kr nå😡

#3012

@LarsErik64 Remember the company has several types of audiences through the LinkedIn page.

The post you mentioned is created for the purpose if activated LinkedIn ads, based on the hashtags, targeted for potential customers and partners. This is just one thing they do from time to time as part of the marketing mix.

I wouldnt interpret it as “nothing to report”.

1 Like
#3013

Leser det ikke som det, men heller som en lite interessant og intetsigende oppdatering. Noe det meste er og har vært de siste kvartaler.

#3015

Agree Vincent - There is a shift in how CrayoNano will inform the market - with a reason… Soon we know why…

#3016

Let’s hope :+1:

#3018

As many of you, I have signed up and received the newsletter.

I clicked on this part to request test reports for the 500 and 700 mA LEDs:
image

After a couple of mails back and forth they sent me the PDFs. The files and slides are water marked with my name, so I’ll only share a couple of screenshots of the most interesting slides:

image

image
image702×124 21.9 KB

#3019

hadde de ikke kommet med tester som er nyere enn dette?
ref under: CrayoNano’s CrayoLED™ H-series tested at 500 mA—140 mW with L70 > 4,000 hours

evt blander jeg resultat?
Eller klarer de ikke oppdatere hva de oppnår?

#3020

CrayoNano has in total published test results for 3 different tests to the public for the CrayoLED™ CLH-N3S specifically. The numbers beat most competition globally:

15 Dec 2022:
Current: 350mA (nominal/default)
Result: Over 10 000 hours

27 Mar 2023:
Current: 500mA
Result: 4000 hours

20 Dec 2023:
Current: 500mA (same current again, new test)
Result: 8000 hours ( ← double improvement since March)

Current: 700mA (pushing it)
Result: 4000 hours

15 Dec 2022:

27 Mar 2023:

20 Dec 2023: