Diskusjon Triggere Porteføljer Aksjonærlister

CrayoNano AS

If someone buys the whole company its a legit question - but if they get a new minority (strategic) investor, I still think it would be cruicial to have these roles in place.

Philips bør jo kjenne sin besøkelsestid… https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2024/07/29/8160021/philips-stiger-over-13-prosent-etter-sterkt-andre-kvartal

1 Like

:money_with_wings::money_with_wings::money_with_wings::money_with_wings:

CrayoLed?
Utrolig mange LED-lys i en slik reaktor.

UV_LED_Wastewater_Disinfection_The_Future_is_Upon_Us_1722291814.pdf (4,9 MB)

kan meget vel være cnano-dioder der, siden det er aqui-sense-utstyr som benyttes. Uansett er det en god bekreftelse her:
In this work, the 280 nm UV LED reactor inactivated significantly
more E. coli and total coliforms than anticipated which prevented a more
precise assessment of the reactor performance limitations. All full-scale
UV exposure were near or in the tailing region of disinfection but aligned
with bench-scale auditing. Future work is planned to evaluate UV LED
performance at higher flow rates and lower power outputs to achieve
fluences within the log linear portion of the disinfection curve. Overall,
this work demonstrates that UV LED technologies can be applied at a
municipal-scale use and are not only for small-scale applications in
drinking water treatment.

Det hersker vel ingen tvil om markedspotensialet, men jeg innbiller meg at det er mange aktører med relativt/tilsynelatende like produkter der ute og faren for å ikke nå opp er stor.
Som før, så tror jeg at den store muligheten ligger i at den etterhvert mer mytiske enn reelle generasjon 2 kan realiseres med troverdige tester og markedsføring.
Selskapets mer og mer irrasjonelle framferd; kvitter seg med nøkkelpersonell, prøver å blåse liv i gamle artikler/nyheter om sin fortreffelighet og snarlig notering (!), merkelige emisjoner, avnotering fra NOTC, osv, er umulig å tolke ensidig, men jeg finner lite tillitvekkende ved denne oppførselen.
At selskapet nå igjen frontes av den avgåtte og tidligere svært så bullish CEO, nå styreleder (Uthus), og ikke av nåværende CEO (Dobbertin), er også litt underlig.
Uthus er vel i realiteten over i nye oppgaver som sin hovedrolle og styreleder-rollen var vel antatt å bli litt perifer, mens forhåpningene til Dobbertin har jo av forståelige grunner vært store.
Så langt er han usynlig.

3 Likes

Enig med deg @SuperTechInfo :blush:

Har også sett intervjuet, og tenker din oppsummering er veldig spot on.

1 Like

Some new changes to employees observed and the conclusion is the same, that the deep tech related and employees with highest education are being kept. Application Engineering is related to computer simulations software and last years one other position in this field ended.

1: Group Controller now taking role as Finance Director (the new temp CFO?)

2: Application Engineering Manager is now “opentowork” (position probably ended and just got a recommendation from other employee which is typical).

3: Business Analyst quitting (position probably ended, older employees expressing relief of new job).

4: The new CEO has the following job description stating responsibility for a lot including specifically attaching “investor relations” and “restructuring” as skills for the Crayonano position.

Full balance sheet responsibility for early stage revenue tech scale-up with ~35 head counts and reporting line to the board of directors. Direct responsibility for finance, investor relations / capital raising / equity story as well as technology development, having direct reports for operations and sales&marketing.

1 Like

Takk for oppsummering og deling.

3 Likes

:+1:Record high, hva vil det si egentlig ?

Iallfall mer enn i mai, og da ble denne meldt: https://crayonano.com/news/crayonano-announces-volume-delivery-to-a-key-uv-c-led-water-disinfection-customer

Men ikke noe tall å forholde seg til

Det er nok salg til Hergy eller AquiSense, eller begge. Håper de blir fast leverandør til AquiSense, de ser ut til å ha noe bra på gang.

It looks like they are increasing the buzz, at the same time, when stated they are in processes with industrial strategic long-term investors.

It might be parallel buzz/marketing when in negotiations with new investors, however they wont be able to negotiate without exclusive term sheet, and that term sheet also restricts what can be published.

I would see increased buzz as not a good sign when communicating the company being in process with securing long-term capital from strategic industrial investors. If the discussion are progressing great, no buzz needed.

If this is a play before IPOing, could be, but unlikely.

1 159 261 preference shares a 14,- = 16,2 MNOK

This financing round positions us to implement our commercial strategies effectively and prepare for the next funding round at a valuation no less than the previous one.

1 Like

Some complain when there are no buzz, some complain when there is buzz :man_shrugging:

I really cannot se anything wrong with this tweet that is barely stating facts we all knew before.

Det er berettiget å stille spørsmål om denne meldingen på linkedin, når informasjonen er ca 2 måneder gammel. For meg er det useriøst å skrive om gammelt info på nytt

2 Likes