Ja, uavhengig av hva fyren tror, så svares det også utrolig merkelig på journalistens spørsmål… 
Spesielle greier 
1 Like
Berdal mener at årsaken til dette er at mange eldre er vaksinert, og at vi begynner å se effekten av det. I tillegg mener han at økningen i totalt antatt smittede kan forklare endringen.
Risikoen for at den enkelte unge havner på sykehus på grunn av korona er på promillenivå. 1 promille av 1000 smittede er bare 1, mens 1 promille av 100.000 smittede er 100.
1 Like
Flere døde i aldersgruppen 0-39 år med vaksine, enn med covid. Den med Covid hadde en “alvorlig bakenforliggende diagnose”. Mens to friske kvinner i 30 årene er døde etter vaksinering, det undersøkes fortsatt om det er sammenheng med vaksinene eller bare tilfeldigheter som ligger bak.
3 Likes
6 Likes
Since vaccinations with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine began and approximately 1.6 million vaccinations have been performed in Germany to date, seven cases of severe cerebral venous thrombosis (six of them sinus vein thrombosis in women) have been reported in Germany - three affected individuals have died
Six women and one man aged approximately 20 to 50 years were affected (as of 15 March 2021). The illnesses occurred in the period from four to 16 days after vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
2 Likes
Det nærmer seg punktet i Brasil hvor intensivhjelp ikke er tilgjengelig lenger.
De skulle åpnet litt mer opp så viruset kunne mutert seg ufarlig. Eller vent litt, Norge har jo lockdown, så det ville ikke hjulpet.
Går vel forbi Kina i antall smitta innen en uke nå. Merkelig greier 
Hmm, spesiell overskrift.
«The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis»
The Centre for Research on Globalization promotes conspiracy theories and falsehoods.[28] It has reported that the September 11 attacks were a false flag attack planned by the CIA,[2] that the United States and its allies fund al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, and that sarin gas was not used in the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack, which globalresearch.ca articles characterized as a false flag operation orchestrated by terrorists opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.[6][23] Other articles published on the site have asserted that the 7 July 2005 London bombings were perpetrated by the United States, Israel, and United Kingdom.[14] Chossudovsky has himself posted articles on the site which suggested that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset, and accusing the United States, Israel and Britain of plotting to conquer the world.[14] The Centre has also promoted the Irish slavery myth, prompting a letter by more than 80 scholars debunking the myth.[27]
@Stockwolf tror vi rett og slett bare kan avskrive den kilden du kom med der.
3 Likes
Ok, no prob.
Men hvordan tolkes/ oversettes denne teksten?
Jeg er ikke sterk (på det heller) innen politisk-medisinsk terminologi.
WHO guidance (…) states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed ( 1 ). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.
WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases ( 2 ). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.
Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.
1 Like
Finn deg en annen kilde er mitt råd, ikke bruk tid på folk som blander fakta med random shit. Det gjelder både nyhetskilder og råd fra folk på forumet som gir råd om aksjer.
Teksten jeg ønsker en forklaring/tolkning/oversettelse på i posten over, er direkte fra WHO sin hjemmeside.
Hvilken annen kilde enn det anbefaler du isåfall?
Rett fra WHO sin side, inkludert (…)?