Bra kart Morti. Bare synd at det viser hvem som stemte rødt og blått ved valget i 2016…
“Or this map I threw together using Daily Kos Elections calculations showing the Presidential winner by Congressional District — Clinton won only 205 districts to Trump’s 235, despite winning the popular vote.”
Renta holdes høy fordi presset i økonomien og inflasjonen er for høy. Fed ønsker lavere rente, men det går ikke enda.
Det er vanskelig å diskutere med deg når elementær økonomisk forståelse er fraværende.
Bra detektivarbeid 
. Ser ut som det samme kartet 
godt vi har rom for å gjøre feil og en sjelden gang bli korrigert riktig 
Det skal mye til!
Jeg har mastergrad 
i økonomi. Men så scorte jeg også 98% på kommunikasjon på personlighetstester utført av børsnoterte selskap Storebrand Finansrådgivning da de headhuntet 
meg.
Så jeg er sikkert litt mer opptatt av presis 
ordlegging enn mange andre.
Over til viktigere ting.
Nå kommer også tenketanker med samme budskap som jeg har hatt. Kanskje de er en av følgerne mine. Folk med uvanlig høy IQ blir fulgt tett av de betydningsfulle haha 
Er enkelte som er veldig opptatt av å skryte av seg selv , så for morro skyld så spurte jeg chatgpt om den visste om noen Trump løgner. Den spyttet ut følgende;
Trump claimed that his inauguration crowd in 2017 was the largest in history. However, photographic evidence and public transportation data showed that the crowd size was significantly smaller than that of Barack Obama’s 2009 inauguration.
Trump frequently took credit for economic achievements that were continuations of trends from the Obama administration. For example, he often claimed to have created the best economy ever, but key metrics like job growth and stock market increases had begun to rise during Obama’s tenure.
Trump repeatedly claimed that the United States was leading the world in terms of its response to the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the country having one of the highest per capita infection and death rates. He also made false claims about the availability of testing and medical supplies early in the pandemic.
Trump claimed that he had built hundreds of miles of new border wall. While construction did take place, much of it was replacement or reinforcement of existing barriers rather than new wall.
Trump claimed that his tax cuts were the biggest in history. While significant, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was not the largest; other tax cuts, such as those implemented by Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, had a larger impact on GDP.
Trump claimed that his renegotiation of NAFTA (resulting in the USMCA) was a completely new trade deal and a vast improvement. However, many experts and analysts noted that the USMCA was largely similar to NAFTA, with some modifications.
Trump claimed he would replace the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) with a much better health care plan that would cover everyone and be more affordable. However, no comprehensive replacement plan was ever introduced or passed during his tenure.
Trump has claimed to have donated millions of dollars to charity. Investigations, including those by The Washington Post, found that many of his claims were exaggerated or unverifiable, and in some cases, he used his charity’s funds for personal and business expenses.
Trump claimed Trump University provided a high-quality education and was a great success. However, the institution was the subject of numerous lawsuits and complaints, ultimately leading to a $25 million settlement for defrauding students.
These examples illustrate a pattern of exaggeration and misrepresentation in Trump’s public statements and claims.
Her skraper man vel bare overflaten av floden av løgner
Feil tråd
Det viktige for den jevne amerikaner er nok uansett dette:
Households with incomes in the top 1 percent will receive an average tax cut of more than $60,000 in 2025, compared to an average tax cut of less than $500 for households in the bottom 60 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center (TPC)
Trump Administration officials claimed their centerpiece corporate tax rate cut would “very conservatively” lead to a $4,000 boost in household income.[5] New research shows that workers who earned less than about $114,000 on average in 2016 saw “no change in earnings” from the corporate tax rate cut, while top executive salaries increased sharply.[6] Similarly, rigorous research concluded that the tax law’s 20 percent pass-through deduction, which was skewed in favor of wealthy business owners, has largely failed to trickle down to workers in those companies who aren’t owners.[7] Like the Bush tax cuts before it,[8] the 2017 Trump tax cut was a trickle-down failure.
First, in addition to the top 1 percent receiving very large tax cuts, the 2017 law delivered the largest average tax cut — measured as a percentage of pre-tax income — to households in the 95-99thpercentiles. Their tax cut from the 2017 law amounts to 3.2 percent of their pre-tax income, on average (or nearly $13,000, on average).[18] This is more than triple the roughly 1 percent average percentage income gain of the bottom 60 percent.[19] (See Figure 2.)
Med andre ord, ikke den jevne amerikaner 
Dette er mer eller mindre identisk med min tolkning av Trump og hva vi kan ha i vente når han vinner valget:
– Den europeiske oppfatningen av hva president Trump vil gjøre med Nato, er feil. Jeg tror ikke at president Trump vil forlate Nato. Men han vil bedømme alliansen ut fra sin styrke. Og han vil stille høye krav, sier Nile Gardiner til VG.
– Hvilke krav kan europeerne i Nato vente fra Trump?
– Mye vil handle om byrdefordeling. Jeg tror at Trump vil forkaste to-prosent regelen. Jeg venter at han vil kreve at medlemslandene bruker minst tre prosent på forsvar, sier Gardiner.
– Det eneste som gjenstår som kan konfrontere Russland, er avskrekking, konfrontasjon og militær makt, legger han til.
Om personligheten:
Men Nile Gardiner mener at Europa ikke må legge for mye i Trumps aggressive uttalelse:
– Jeg møtte Trump flere ganger i Det hvite hus i hans tid som president. Han kommer med uttalelser for å få fram en reaksjon, få folk til å handle. Og når han kommer med slike ville uttalelser om Nato, så forstår jeg at Europa skjelver langt inn i ryggmargen. Men hans mål er egentlig bare å vekke folk til å foreta seg noe. Han kommer ikke til å tillate at Putin gjør som han selv vil.
– Jeg tolker uttalelsen som at en «wake up call», en del av hans stil, og en teknikk han har med fra sin fortid som forretningsmann, sier Gardiner.
Lurte på om denne hørte til i meme tråden , men tok sjansen på å slenge den inn her.
Jo se utheving.
Dette er Trump politikk.
Fred Krueger:
Dubai has implemented “Kruegernomics”
Formula is bright and clear: Hong Kong (pre 1997). Singapore. Dubai.
Imagine that for the USA
Hvis det Trump sier ikke stemmer, hvorfor dukket alt dette opp først etter han stilte til valg?
Tegn på at Biden politikken ikke virker når de får så dårlige tall jevnt over. Dårligste tall på 10 år. Men da Trump var president nådde de nye topper hele tiden. Noe Biden nøt godt av i starten av perioden sin, før hans egen politikk fikk effekt.
chatgpt
During Donald Trump’s presidency, the number of false or misleading claims he made has been extensively tracked by various fact-checking organizations. The Washington Post’s Fact Checker, one of the most prominent sources for this data, reported that Trump made over 30,000 false or misleading claims during his four years in office. This count includes a wide range of statements on various topics, made through different mediums such as speeches, tweets, and interviews.
It’s important to note that this figure includes not only outright lies but also misleading statements and exaggerations. Different fact-checking organizations may have slightly different methodologies, but the general consensus is that the number is in the tens of thousands.
For a more detailed breakdown, you can refer to comprehensive reports from sources like The Washington Post, Politifact, and FactCheck.org.
Tech selskapene donerer store summer til demokratene. Akkurat som oljeselskaper og finans donerer til republikanerne.
Det er nok grunnen til at søkemotorer, AI modeller og algoritmer er tunet til deres fordel.
