Har du noen slags definisjon pĂ„ hva âveldig braâ er?
âŠeller er det bare en vag forestilling om âveldig mye oppâ?
Veldig bra for meg er alt fra 400-600.
Ekstremt bra er 800+.
All data tyder ikke pÄ det. Jeg henviser til denne posten https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/mz7c7h/put_anomalies_pt1_were_127_million_synthetic/, da den setter ord pÄ det jeg ikke klarer Ä forklare ryddig nok selv. Om du tar deg bryet Ä lese den da selvsagt. USA sitt problem er at de har mulighet Ä skjule Äpne shorts, og har lagt opp til et system som muliggjÞr at man kan vÊre short, uten Ä mÄtte rapportere det. VERSTE FALL fÄr man en ubetydelig bot om et Är fra SEC. Denne rÞra eksisterer for man kan ikke ha tiltro til hva disse selskapene faktisk melder inn, som det finnes utallige bÞter pÄ som bekrefter akkurat dette.
SĂ„ summert rundt $1.6-1.7 bn i kassa
Why NSCC-002 is VERY Important | Must Read
DD
This is an edited version of a repost I saw last month thatâs relevant to the NSCC-002 approval determination on June 21.
ââââââââââââââââââââââ
NSCC-002 is the biggest news to come and the endgame catalyst.
NSCC-801 Passed with no objections in May.
For this rule to enter effect it needs to piggyback on NSCC-002, which if no objections are made again, will be passed June 21.
Let me remind you just how powerful 801 isâŠ
Once 801 enters effect, all hedgefunds holding short positions will be monitored every single minute. They will have to report every single minute their value in short positions versus their actual money on hand. If they fail to report or their short position value crosses the threshold where it is higher than their money on hand, itâs an immediate warning to deposit the funds needed to cover within ONE HOUR. Failure to do so leads to the NSCC immediately overriding operations and liquidating the hedge funds entirely, one after another until all that is left is the trillions in insurance.
This is bigger than anything. This is so big, that this rule will prevent a squeeze even a fraction of this magnitude happening ever again. It is that powerful, and with its implementation at this stage of the game⊠it will catalyze a squeeze so large that calling it the MOASS will be an understatement. The fact this isnât at the top of all posts is mind boggling.
If NSCC-002 passes June 21, we have entered the squeeze. Hedgefunds will be on a leash that gets tighter the more they pull.
Starting in after hours and following into the subsequent day after approval, they will be under so much pressure and restriction that one of two things will happen:
Their ability to short will be at such a minimum level that our buying power will just break through their sell walls and the price will just continue to rise and rise until they can no longer afford to suffer the loss on their end and be forced to cover.
The other outcome would be strong final blows of sell off aggression and shorting, literally out of pure ignorance and recklessnes which will activate 801, and thus the great fall of the hedgefunds via margin call.
If 002 passes on June 21, 801 will catapult us past relying on any SEC investigations or whatever Adam Aron has up his sleeve.
A hedge fund lawyer (specifically from SIG) was able to delay 002 for 45 days in May. They will NOT be able to do that again. 002 will either get approved or rejected on June 21. Out of the 17 critical regulations pertaining to the AMC MOASS, 15 got approved very quickly (NSCC-002 is pending and DTCC-005 passed last week). Considering that these regulations have a track record of getting approved without discord, itâs reasonable to infer that 002 will get approved June 21 as well.
To conclude, I want to remind you that 801 going into full effect not only relates to us⊠but the 100+ other stocks these hedgefunds have short positions in. If just one of those stocks like GME pull ahead because of 801 it will be a domino effect like never seen before.
NSCC-002 being approved will be the true beginning of the end.
Hold. You hold like this will never happen again in your life because if 002 passes I can assure you, that will be the case.
This is not financial advice. Not my own dd⊠but needed to be shared
ââââââââââââââââââââââ
Note: Even if it gets passed tomorrow, we need to see it published on the Federal Register first before it becomes effective immediately. Also, hedgies could take advantage of T+10 rule to try to drag out the margin calls another week or two. NSCC-002 is BIG for us, but donât expect anything immediate, and keep your guard up for anything. Weâre in the right direction. Buy, hold, and relax. We got this!
AMC 500k
En utrolig god presentasjon pĂ„ hvordan fondene âdekketâ shorten: https://i.redd.it/z7k7jiowsq871.png
og hvorfor det voldsomme opsjonsvolumet, med usaklige OTM puts og ITM calls gir mening. Plutselig var ikke FTDs der lenger, etter noen gigangt posisjoner ble satt i opsjonsmarkedet. (husk at en PUT\CALL Contract er for 100 aksjer)
@Evilfreud, dette er den beste forklaringen jeg kan komme med for Ă„ belyse at shorten neppe er dekket.
GME er opp ca. 30% akkurat nÄ.
Siste nytt er at en dyktig fyr ved navn Criand mener Ä ha avdekket hvordan hedgefondene manipulerer kursen og hva som forÄrsaker kurshoppene vi har sett fÞr kvartalsslutt. Han spÄdde at noe ville skje fra ca 26. august hvis teorien holdt, men dagen etter han postet dette virker det som noe allerede skjer.
Mer her: https://reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ojh2eh/_/h9yjszg/?context=1
For alle dere med diamondhands der ute, dette er ferskt og nĂždvendig lesestoff:
TLDR: grĂžnn periode = kurshopp:
Leste denne pÄ morgenkvisten, og det forankrer mistanken min pÄ den reelle SI% og gir mening mtp. de synkrone bevegelsene over flere aksjer. De har samla en kurv som shortes via ETRS, som ikke rapporteres. @Evilfreud, her har du Ärsaken til at SI% ikke samsvarer pÄ fks. FINRA
Equity Total Return Swaps
The way that it allows naked shorting is because the Hedge Fund âborrowsâ prime brokerage privileges through the swap. The Hedge Fund is not short on its balance sheet but they are effectively short through the exposure of the derivative . The counterparty of the swap is the one who is short the underlying. But, because the broker dealer can short for the sake of liquidity, they do not need to report short interest on the stock by internalizing the orders and selling against their own âinventoryâ.
Det virker jo for dumt til Ă„ vĂŠre sant, men trafikken i PUTs og overnevnte understĂžtter det. Flott du deler @pdx !
Takk for deling av siste til criand, veldig bra innlegg.
Finner det ganske interessant at pĂ„ en dag hvor GME gĂ„r opp 30% kommer ingen dekning, men dagen etter kommer nyheter om âGME drops 5%â og investorpalace skriver en artikkel om top 10 shortsqueeze plays uten Ă„ nevne overnevnte.
Anyways, om GME dansen var et youtube klipp er det dette Epic Boys Dance in Schoolyard - YouTube
Dette har vÊrt en pÄfallende realitet i lang tid. Amerikansk finansmedia setter alle kluter til for Ä prÞve Ä dysse dette ned. Husker jeg sÄ dette pÄ hver bidige side:
Var det noen norske Þkonomer som hadde kursmÄl i nÊrheten her vi er nÄ?
Mye sĂžppel fra MSM idag.
HĂžydepunktet er Jim Cramer sine tweets som f.eks âbuy AMCâ og âtell me one reason to buy GMEâ.
Skulle handle pÄ 180 idag men var for tÄlmodig.
Friskt