ChatGPT henter ut noe vettugt fra
1-s2.0-S1750583625000088-main.pdf (2,7 MB)
"Here’s a deeper breakdown of specific aspects related to Capsol Technologies’ HPC process:
1. Cost Breakdown and Comparison with Amine Systems
Capsol HPC-Based Process:
- Capture Cost: EUR 114–133/tCO2 for a typical configuration, depending on the availability of waste heat and operational hours.
-
Capital Intensity:
- High CAPEX due to extensive heat exchanger networks required for handling large liquid volumes and heat transfer needs.
- CAPEX accounts for 50–60% of the total cost.
- Heat exchangers and pumps contribute the most to equipment costs, especially when designed for high liquid flows.
-
Energy Consumption:
- Electricity demand: ~640 kWh/tCO2 for pumping and regeneration steps.
- Heat demand: Significant but reduced when waste heat or heat pumps are used.
Amine-Based Process:
- Capture Cost: EUR 40–80/tCO2, generally lower than HPC due to faster absorption kinetics and optimized systems.
-
Energy Consumption:
- Amine systems require higher regeneration temperatures (120–150°C), leading to elevated energy costs.
- Electricity demand: ~100 kWh/tCO2 for compression and other utilities.
Comparison Summary:
- Advantages of Capsol: Safer solvents, lower corrosion, and potential for significant cost reduction with waste heat.
- Disadvantages of Capsol: Higher baseline costs and slower absorption rates, which require process enhancements.
2. Integration Strategies to Lower Costs
Waste Heat Utilization:
- Capsol processes operate at low regeneration temperatures (~65°C), making them ideal for industries with low-grade waste heat.
- Industries like pulp mills and waste-to-energy plants can use their existing heat sources to reduce operating costs by EUR 30–40/tCO2.
Heat Pump Systems:
- When waste heat is unavailable, integrating heat pumps can make the process self-sufficient.
- The cost of heat from a heat pump depends on electricity prices. A break-even heat price occurs around EUR 13–20/MWh at electricity costs of EUR 30–60/MWh.
Process Modifications:
-
Higher Pressure Operation:
- Compressing flue gas to higher pressures (e.g., 10 bar) improves absorption efficiency, reduces liquid flow requirements, and lowers regeneration energy needs.
- Challenges: Increased CAPEX for compressors and pressure-rated equipment.
-
Parallel Stages:
- Dividing the absorption process into multiple parallel stages reduces the liquid-to-gas ratio, enabling smaller equipment sizes and energy savings.
3. Potential Industrial Applications
1. Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants:
- These facilities typically operate with long annual load hours (6,500–8,000 hours), improving Capsol’s economics through higher utilization rates.
- Flue gases with moderate CO2 content align well with CapsolEoP® technology.
2. Gas Turbine Plants:
- CapsolGT® is suited for the lower CO2 concentration and higher oxygen levels in gas turbine flue gases.
- These plants benefit from Capsol’s low-temperature regeneration, which can be coupled with the turbine’s exhaust heat.
3. Waste-to-Energy Plants:
- Flue gases from waste incineration are a prime target for Capsol systems.
- Integration with waste heat recovery systems can drastically lower costs.
4. Challenges and Solutions
| Challenge | Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Slow CO2 Absorption Rates | Increases absorber size and energy demand | Use higher pressures, microbubble generators, or promoters. |
| High Liquid Flow Requirements | Larger pumps, heat exchangers, and CAPEX | Divide absorption stages or optimize solution concentrations. |
| High Initial Costs (CAPEX) | Limits deployment in small-scale industries | Scale up to larger capacities to reduce per-unit costs. |
| Heat and Electricity Dependence | Affects OPEX significantly | Utilize waste heat, optimize heat integration, or adopt renewable energy sources. |
5. Future Directions
Capsol Technologies could further improve competitiveness by:
- Developing Intensified Equipment: Integrating rotating packed beds or microbubble generators to enhance CO2 mass transfer.
- Scaling Up Demonstrations: Larger facilities could reduce CAPEX/tCO2 and demonstrate economic viability.
- Targeting Policy-Driven Markets: Industries in regions with carbon pricing or CCS incentives (e.g., EU and North America) are ideal for early adoption.
- Collaborating with Industrial Partners: Partnerships with waste-to-energy and heavy industrial sectors (e.g., steel or cement) could lower integration costs."